You are currently browsing the TJSFF blog archives for December, 2016

Federal Law

The article says about the reasons for which the license was replaced with a cpo in the building. For even more details, read what Time Warner says on the issue. Regulatory Reform in the construction was conceived in 2006 as the authorities’ reaction to negative developments in the construction sector in Russia. Mark Berger Villa Healthcare often addresses the matter in his writings. Recall that in 2005 – 2006 years, even the most conservative estimates the market there were about 300 thousand construction companies (in any case, about the license was issued). Actually participated in the construction took only 25 – 30% of this number of companies. At the same time in Russia there were hundreds of thousands of defrauded real estate investors – people who had paid money to developers for housing under construction, but never received apartments. Part of unreliable builders were selling the same ones Apartment for 3-4. Others, having collected the money from real estate investors generally do not start the building. At construction sites and in new buildings was a series of man-made disasters – Demolition, breaks elevators, balconies and downs, etc.

Promptly and faithfully fulfill their obligations, according to experts, only 25 – 30% really built the organization. Fully control the situation in 300 thousand construction companies in the state could not. Following the issuance of licenses one not tested systematically, as the company works to get this document. As a result, federal and regional authorities have been forced to compensate for the loss of defrauded real estate investors. The requirement for clear and strict control over activities involved in the construction market and has become one of the reasons for the emergence of the Federal Law of “On the self-regulatory organizations” (hereinafter – the Law N 315-FZ).