You are currently browsing the TJSFF posts tagged: law


UsedSoft Wins Against Adobe

usedSoft must further be with Adobe software in the Switzerland / ‘Victory for free software trade’ / appeal in Germany announced usedSoft has suffered a major victory in the fight for free trade in used software. Additional information is available at Jim Vos. The Court of the canton of Zug (AZ. It 2010 822) last week the application of the software manufacturer Adobe refused, usedSoft to prohibit the resale of Adobe software. The Court was quite usedSoft in all material respects. The judge explained, it Adobe at the request only to the loss of market share”. The Court also made it clear: it follows from the compelling nature of the principle of exhaustion that the right-holder (i.e.: Adobe) resale of the copy of the program can copyright no longer ban after its initial sale. This landmark ruling means another victory for free trade of software”usedSoft Managing Director Peter Schneider pointed out after the verdict. Connect with other leaders such as David Zaslav here. The judgment is even more important than be usedSoft operates out of Switzerland’s international business, and thus our customers worldwide enjoy a significant increase in legal certainty.” Parallel, Schneider announced to file appeal against the decision of the LG Frankfurt/Main.

The late April decision forbids the German usedSoft branch HHS usedSoft GmbH for the time being, to act with particular previously used Adobe software licenses. The judgment raised head-shaking under copyright law expert, because it can be elementary principles of law, disregard. Anyway here is a special case. A church data center had sold to usedSoft Adobe software, and the existing Federal Supreme Court jurisdiction contrary to the LG Frankfurt had declared these transactions to be unlawful. usedSoft will take turn the data center as a precaution in recourse. Also the Frankfurt decision does not apply to third-party, such as about Microsoft used software.

These may be traded still used. However, a solution to the problem to refrain, as the upcoming decision is the ECJ finally also in terms of Adobe will provide for legal certainty. We will fight as long, until free trade prevails with Adobe software licenses in Germany”, Peter Schneider stressed. Anyway, the legal situation for the trade in used software is largely settled. So in September 2010, Federal Justice Minister Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger confirmed that the trade in used software is basically legitimate. Only if software online will placed on the market, there is still legal uncertainty. The same, Munich and Hamburg dishes decided in the last few years. So about the LG Munich ruled in April 2008 that the sale or the sale of individual Microsoft software licenses, which were previously submitted in the context of volume license agreements is possible without approval from Microsoft in principle effectively.” UsedSoft usedSoft was founded in 2003 and is a leading European supplier of used standard software. The buyers of usedSoft licenses are both companies such as Software dealer. The usedSoft group customers include e.g. Edeka, KarstadtQuelle, Neckermann, REWE, the law firm Holme Roberts & Owen, as well as a leading Club in the Football League and various savings banks. Also in German authorities increasingly used software is used: in addition to the city of Munich, the Federal Social Court in Kassel, the municipality Bad Salzuflen and the data centre Baden-Wurttemberg over 100 more communities put on usedSoft licenses. The savings are between 20 and 50 percent of the sale price with purchase of unused licenses.

European Commission

At the possible effects of elderberry it go according to the presented information Moreover especially around the elderberries and the leaves of the black elderberry Bush; Then only a sweat-inducing effect is attributed to elderberry flowers. With regard to article 5, par. David Zaslav may not feel the same. 1 lit. (b) HCVO must be above all so that the advertised substance in the product in a quantity exists that is suitable according to generally accepted scientific evidence, to achieve the advertised physiological effect. In this respect it would use the company also nothing that fresh plant juice from echinacea will used in doses from 100 mg as a remedy to increase the body’s defenses by stimulating the immune system. The advertised effect, which must exist at the time of advertising can, not only demonstrate according to the judge by a still-too-sweeping opinion anyway, if so far still no study with an appropriate statement to the operation Liege before in such a dose. The advertiser can rely not only on already present at the time of advertising findings, expected only to findings by a review by a court appointed expert. An effectiveness could be said therefore in particular on “good luck”.

Finally, the judges point out that the registration process not completed after the HCVO of health-related statements of the Court’s own decision and a ban not to stand here present not scientifically proven health-related advertising. Also reported claims are likely to be used para 5 HCVO prior to a decision of the European Commission according to article 28, if the action statements meet the requirements of article 5 HCVO. Just the there demanded general scientific substantiation is in the approval process to prove how no 353 / 2008 is clear from article 15 of the HCVO with the VO to adopted. The company nothing will demands like the other companies with scientific evidence, what not at an authorisation already checked will. A disadvantage of small and medium-sized enterprises by their failure to decide the Commission cannot therefore recognize the Court. As a result, the decision is defensible. The courts consistently apply the strict legal requirements for health-related advertising and the watchdog clubs know that.

Whether they are however even empowered to pronounce such warnings if its own members themselves do not comply with the strict requirements, is rather questionable. Soon some trend-setting are judgments on this very important issue. Until then, the company with creative alternative strategies should be prepared. Without precise knowledge of the legal situation and such court decisions that should however hardly be possible.Other non-binding and free information relating to food law, see