You are currently browsing the TJSFF posts tagged: philosophy

The Collector

It only has a destination that it is the death, and in this departure for another world does not have possibility to take luggage, credit card, nor the least can go directing our proper car, the transport that is offered in them is of obligator use. But, nor everything in them is tax in this passage, can still take the souvenirs, the learning acquired in this life and the love that was directed in them by the people who had been part of our wonderful existence in this called school here Land. Then as suggestion it places in the top of the 2012 list: Goal n1 – To be a better person! I am certain that with this goal already we will only have an enormous work for the entire year, but in case that still let us want to establish plus some goals, it is important to remember to always prioritize the relationships, therefore through them it only is that we evoluimos and in fact in them we become better beings. To desire a good day gari that cedinho is working in its street soon, to offer a smile to the collector of the bus, to be gentile with the salesman of the periodical board, to be compassionate with the lying beggar in the sidewalk, to be tolerant with the assistant in the work, to be patient with the head who many times less knows of what you that executes the tasks, loving being with the family and mainly to pardon itself exactly for some imperfections that we commit every day, are some receitinhas basic that we can try in this experience of improvement. At this moment, everything what desire is that you have good reflections of end of year and good luck in the planning of 2012!

The Construction

For Vsquez (1990), the theory meets in the field of the ideas, while the practical one represents an activity. If it cannot separate them, but perceive them in linked way, with the practical one subsidizing the theory and vice versa. In the social context it is not enough that the individuals are side by side so that they are interacting. She is necessary that it has a shared action makes that them to coexist, to work, to study, together. Interaction is a class action, executed for some individuals, with sights the common and individual objectives. Interacting the individuals the social instances socialize significant learnings in all.

The education is not an exclusive social act of the school. It is probable until it is not the pertaining to school education the one that more influence exerts on the development of the individuals. However, we withhold in them in the boarding of the pedagogical relations investigating the rational interaction in the school. Authors, as You give (1996), Boufleuer (1997), Muhl (1997), Polenz (1997), Gonalvez (1999), Bolzan (2002), Moraes (2002), has dedicated special attention in studying the proposals of Habermans for the construction of the communicative rationality in the educative process. These studies have pointed evidences of that the school plays its work to satisfy criteria bureaucratic, many tecnocrticos times, centering in this focus the educative process. In this perspective, it has privileged place for the cultural tradition leaving the educative process unprovided of the social and personal expressions as well as of its contextual contributions for the pedagogical action.

In the school, in the educative relations, the participation of the segments is not valued, a time that, has interest in instrumentalizar the effective rationality. Opposing this to make it educative education in the communicative rationality meets. The school can from the habermasiano thought, to assume challenge of the proposal of rationality of this author being considered the interaction as base of the rationality communicative and the education, inserted in the world of the life, determinative in the formation of identities (YOU GIVE, 1996), the stimulaton to the quarrel enters the elements of the school from social arguments (CULLEN, 1999), the construction of the pedagogia of communicative acting (BOUFLEUER, 1998), the promotion of the democratic participation (CULLEN, 1999), perceiving the limpid and idoneous school (CULLEN, 2000), to give critical the hierarchy of being able improper (MARTINI, 2000) and to problematizar educative acts with pertinent, active and critical questionings (OLIVEIRA, 2000).